Publikationen

Foto: chinnarach - stock.adobe.com

Peer-Reviewed Journal-Artikel

  1. Ellinghaus, R., Bausenhart, K. M., Koc, D., Ulrich, R., & Liepelt, R. (2024). Effects of stimulus order on discrimination performance challenge established models of comparative judgement: A meta-analytic review of the Type B effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-024-02479-3
  2. Cracco, E., Liepelt, R., Brass, M., & Genschow, O. (2024). Top-Down Modulation of Motor Priming by Belief About Animacy: A Registered Replication Report. Experimental Psychology, 70, 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000605
  3. Ellinghaus, R., Liepelt, R., Mackenzie, I. G., & Mittelstädt, V. (in press). Perceptual Target Discriminability Modulates the Simon Effect Beyond the Fading of Distractor-Based Activation: Insights from Delta Plots and Diffusion Model Analyses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
  4. Sperl, L., Nicanço Tomé, M. S., Kühn, H., Kreysa, H. (2024): Context Matters: How Experimental Language and Language Environment Affect Mental Representations in Multilingualism. Languages 9(3), 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9030106
  5. Sperl, L.*, Breier, C. M.*, Grießbach, E. & Schweinberger, S. R. (2023). Do typing skills matter? Investigating university students' typing speed and performance in online exams. Higher Education Research & Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2287724; *shared first authorship
  6. Sommer, A., Fischer, R., Borges, U., Laborde, S., Achtzehn, S., & Liepelt, R. (2023). The Effect of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) on Cognitive Control in Multitasking. Neuropsychologia, 187, 108614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108614
  7. Hoffmann, S., Fischer, R., & Liepelt, R. (2023). Valence moderates the effect of stimulus-hand proximity on conflict processing and gaze-cueing. PeerJ, 11, e15286. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15286
  8. Ellinghaus, R., Janczyk, M., Wirth, R., Kunde, W., Fischer, R., & Liepelt, R. (2023). Opposing influences of global and local stimulus-hand proximity on crosstalk interference in dual-tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218231157548
  9. Blech, C., Reimann, D., Ram, N., & Gaschler, R. (2023). Is detecting discontinuity difficult? Evidence from the visual trend classification of scatterplots. American Journal of Psychology, 136(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.5406/19398298.136.1.01
  10. Böttcher, A., Wilken, S., Adelhöfer, N., Raab, M., Hoffmann, S., & Beste, C. (2023). A dissociable functional relevance of theta- and beta-band activities during complex sensorimotor integration. Cerebral Cortex, bhad191. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhad191
  11. Wilken, S., Böttcher, A., Adelhöfer, N., Raab, M., Hoffmann, S., & Beste, C. (2023). The neurophysiology of continuous action monitoring. iScience, 106939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106939
  12. Kim, H., Luo, J., Chu, S., Cannard, C., Hoffmann, S., & Miyakoshi, M. (2023). ICA’s bug: How ghost ICs emerge from effective rank deficiency caused by EEG electrode interpolation and incorrect re-referencing. Frontiers in Signal Processing, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsip.2023.1064138
  13. Naefgen, C., Blech, C., Kriechbaumer, M., Haider, H., Ram, N., & Gaschler, R. (2023). Between- and within-subject covariance perspectives matter for investigations into the relationship between single- and dual-tasking performance. Methods in Psychology, 8, 100110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2023.100110
  14. Hüttner, N.*, Sperl, L.*, & Schroeger, A. (2023). Slow motion bias: Exploring the relation between time overestimation and increased perceived intentionality. Perception, 52(2), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066221139943; *shared first authorship
  15. Böttcher A., Adelhöfer N., Wilken S., Raab M., Hoffmann S., Beste C. (2023) TRACK - a new algorithm and open-source tool for the analysis of pursuit-tracking sensorimotor integration processes. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02065-w
  16. Maier, M. E., Liepelt, R., & Steinhauser, M. (2023). The role of action inhibition for behavioral control in joint action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30, 200–211.https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02162-5
  17. van der Weiden, A., Porcu, E., & Liepelt, R. (2023). Action prediction modulates self-other integration in joint action. Psychological Research, 87, 537–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01674-y
  18. Yu, S., Mückschel, M., Hoffmann, S., Bluschke, A., Pscherer, C., & Beste, C. (2022). The neural stability of perception–motor representations affects action outcomes and behavioral adaptation. Psychophysiology, 60(1), e14146. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14146
  19. Giraudier, M., Ventura-Bort, C., Burger, A. M., Claes, N., D'Agostini, M., Fischer, R., Franssen, M., Kaess, M., Koenig, J., Liepelt, R., Nieuwenhuis, S., Sommer, A., Usichenko, T., Van Diest, I., von Leupoldt, A., Warren, C. M., & Weymar, M. (2022). Evidence for a modulating effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) on salivary alpha-amylase as indirect noradrenergic marker: A pooled mega-analysis. Brain stimulation, 15, 1378–1388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2022.09.009
  20. Schmaußer, M., Hoffmann, S., Raab, M., & Laborde, S. (2022). The effects of noninvasive brain stimulation on heart rate and heart rate variability: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of neuroscience research, 100(9), 1664–1694. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.25062
  21. Rudolph, A.*, Liepelt, R.*, Kaffes, M, Hofmann-Shen, C., Montag, C., Neuhaus, A. H. (2022). Motor cognition in schizophrenia: Control of automatic imitation and mapping of action context are reduced. Schizophrenia Research, 240, 116-124. (*shared first authorship). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2021.12.024
  22. Gaschler, R., Ditsche-Klein, B. E., Kriechbaumer, M., Blech, C., & Wenke, D. (2022). Using position rather than color at the traffic light – Covariation learning-based deviation from instructions in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.967467
  23. Nett, N., Nett, T., Englert, J. & Gaschler, R. (2022). Think scientists—Think male: Science and leadership are still more strongly associated with men than with women in Germany. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12761
  24. Liepelt, R. & Raab, M. (2021). Metacontrol and joint action: How shared goals transfer from one task to another. Psychological Research, 85, 2769–2781. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01443-9
  25. Reimann, D., Blech, C., Ram, N., & Gaschler, R. (2021). Visual model fit estimation in scatterplots: Influence of amount and decentering of noise. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 27(9), 3834–3838. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2021.3051853
  26. Sperl, L., Ruttloff, J. M., Ambrus, G. G., Kaufmann, J. M., Cañal-Bruland, R., Schweinberger, S. R. (2021). Effects of motor restrictions on preparatory brain activity. Experimental Brain Research, 239(11), 3189–3203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-021-06190-w
  27. Sperl, L., Ambrus, G.G., Kaufmann, J.M., Schweinberger, S.R., Cañal-Bruland, R. (2021). Electrophysiological correlates underlying interference control. Biological Psychology, 163, 108138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108138
  28. Sperl, L., Gergeleit, T. & Cañal-Bruland, R. (2021). On the role of different subdimensions of inhibition for successful motor skill change. Human Movement Science, 77, 102801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2021.102801
  29. Sperl, L., Hüttner, N. & Schröger, A. (2021). Why do actions in slow motion videos appear to last longer? On the effect of misconceiving video speed. Perception, 50(1), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0301006620982212
  30. Ellinghaus, R., Giel, S., Ulrich, R., Bausenhart, K.M. (2021). Humans integrate duration information within and across modalities: Evidence for an amodal internal reference of time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(8), 1205-1225. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001002
  31. Reimann, D., Blech, C., & Gaschler, R. (2020). Visual Model Fit Estimation in Scatterplots and Distribution of Attention. Influence of Slope and Noise Level. Experimental Psychology, 67, 292-302. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000499.
  32. Fischer, R., Liepelt, R. (2020). Embodied cognition in multitasking: increased hand-specific task shielding when stimuli are presented near the hand. Psychological Research, 84, 1668–1682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01174-6
  33. Lembcke, H., Buchmüller, T., & Leyendecker, B. (2020). Refugee mother-child dyads’ hair cortisol, post-traumatic stress, and affectionate parenting. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 111, 104470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.104470
  34. Buchmüller, T., Lembcke, H., Busch, J., Kumsta, R., Wolf, O.T., & Birgit Leyendecker (2020). Exploring hair steroid concentrations in asylum seekers, internally displaced refugees, and immigrants. Stress, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253890.2020.1737008
  35. Blech, C., Gaschler, R., & Bilalić, M. (2020). Why do people fail to see simple solutions? Using think-aloud protocols to uncover the mechanism behind the Einstellung (mental set) effect, Thinking & Reasoning, 26(4), 552-580. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2019.1685001
  36. Sperl, L., & Cañal-Bruland, R. (2020). Interindividual differences in the capability to change automatized movement patterns. Acta Psychologica, 204, 103027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103027
  37. Sperl, L. & Cañal-Bruland, R. (2020). Reducing proactive interference in motor tasks. Journal of Motor Behavior, 52, 372-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2019.1635984
  38. Nett, T., Dorrough, A., Jekel, M. & Glöckner, A. (2020). Perceived Biological and Social Characteristics of a Representative Set of German First Names. Social Psychology, 51, 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000383
  39. Miketta, S. & Liepelt, R. (2020). Warum Fake News über Corona hängenbleiben, selbst wenn wir wissen, dass sie fehlerhaft sind. The Inquisite Mind. https://de.in-mind.org/blog/post/kein-weg-zurueck-warum-fake-news-ueber-corona-haengenbleiben-selbst-wenn-wir-wissen-dass
  40. Liepelt, R., Porcu, E., Stenzel, A., & Lappe, M. (2019). Saccadic eye movements do not trigger a joint Simon effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 1896-1904. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01639-0
  41. Bölling, L., Stein, N., Steinicke. F. and Lappe, M., "Shrinking Circles: Adaptation to Increased Curvature Gain in Redirected Walking," in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 2032-2039, May 2019, doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2019.2899228.
  42. Bücker, S., Lembcke, H., & Hinz, M. (2019). Prädiktoren von Einsamkeit und sozialer Isolation im hohen Alter [Predictors of loneliness and social isolation in old age)]. In M. Luhmann & S. Bücker (Eds.), Einsamkeit und soziale Isolation im hohen Alter (pp. 18-34). Bochum: Ruhr-Universität Bochum. https://doi.org/10.13154/294-6397 *shared first authorship
  43. Peterburs, J., Liepelt, R., Voegler, R., Ocklenburg, S., & Straube, T. (2019). It’s not me, it’s you - Differential neural processing of social and non-social nogo cues in joint action. Social Neuroscience, 14, 114–124. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2017.1403374
  44. Norouzi, N., Bölling, L., Bruder, G., & Welch, G. (2019). Augmented rotations in virtual reality for users with a reduced range of head movement. Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055668319841309
  45. Hoffmann, S., Jendreizik, L., Ettinger, U., Laborde, S. (2019). Keeping the pace: the effect of slow paced breathing on error monitoring. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 146, 217-224.
  46. Buchmüller, T., Lembcke, H., Ialuna, F., Busch, J., & Leyendecker, B. (2019). Mental Health Needs of Refugee Children in Specialized Early Education and Care Programs in Germany. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-019-00896-4
  47. Nett, T., Nett, N. & Glöckner, A. (2019). Bayesian Analysis of Processed Information in Decision Making Experiments [pre-print available at https://psyarxiv.com/pxwq7].
  48. Nett, T. & Nett, N. (2019). Kreativität aus systemischer Sicht – Wo ist die Kreativität? In J. S. Haager & T. G. Baudson (Hrsg.), Kreativität in der Schule - finden, fördern, leben (S. 23–38). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22970-2_2
  49. Miketta, S., & Friese, M. (2019). Debriefed but still troubled? About the (in)effectiveness of postexperimental debriefings after ego threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(2), 282–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000155
  50. van der Weiden, A., Liepelt, R., & van Haren, N. E. M. (2019). A matter of you versus me? Experiences of control in a joint go/no-go task. Psychological Research, 83, 842–851. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0903-5
  51. Hoffmann, S., Beste, C., & Raab, M. (2019). Editorial: The Psychophysiology of Action. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1266. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01266
  52. Klempova, B. & Liepelt, R. (2018). Barriers to success: physical separation optimizes event-file retrieval in shared workspaces. Psychological Research, 82, 1158–1176. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0886-2
  53. Dolk, T. & Liepelt, R. (2018). The Multimodal Go-Nogo Simon Effect: Signifying the Relevance of Stimulus Features in the Go-Nogo Simon Paradigm Impacts Event Representations and Task Performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9:2011. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02011
  54. Buchmüller, T., Lembcke, H., Busch, J., Kumsta, R., & Leyendecker, B. (2018). Exploring Mental Health Status and Syndrome Patterns Among Young Refugee Children in Germany. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00212
  55. Tochadse, M., Halai, A. D., Ralph, M. A. L., & Abel, S. (2018). Unification of behavioural, computational and neural accounts of word production errors in post-stroke aphasia. Neurolmage: Clinical, 18, 952-962 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.03.031
  56. Kim, K., Bölling, L., Haesler, S., Bailenson, J., Bruder, G., and Welch, G. F., "Does a Digital Assistant Need a Body? The Influence of Visual Embodiment and Social Behavior on the Perception of Intelligent Virtual Agents in AR," 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), Munich, Germany, 2018, pp. 105-114, doi: 10.1109/ISMAR.2018.00039.
  57. Ellinghaus, R., Ulrich, R., & Bausenhart, K. M. (2018). Effects of stimulus order on comparative judgments across stimulus attributes and sensory modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(1), 7-12.
  58. Busch, J., Bihler, L.-M., Lembcke, H., Buchmüller, T., Diers, K., & Leyendecker, B. (2018). Challenges and Solutions Perceived by Educators in an Early Childcare Program for Refugee Children. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01621
  59. Ellinghaus, R., Karlbauer, M., Bausenhart, K.M., Ulrich, R. (2018). On the time course of automatic response activation in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 82(4), 734-743.
  60. Hosang, T. J., Fischer, R., Pomp, J., & Liepelt, R. (2018). Dual-Tasking in the Near-Hand Space: Effects of Stimulus-Hand Proximity on Between-Task Shifts in the Psychological Refractory Period Paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 9:1942. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01942
  61. Michel, R., Bölte, J., & Liepelt, R. (2018). When a Social Experimenter Overwrites Effects of Salient Objects in an Individual Go/No-Go Simon Task – An ERP Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 9:674. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00674
  62. Bröker, L., Liepelt, R., Poljac, E., Künzell, S., Ewolds, H., de Oliveira, R. F., & Raab, M. (2018). Multitasking as a choice: a perspective. Psychological Research, 82, 12-23. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0938-7
  63. Jäger, P., Claassen, K., Schillen, P., Lembcke, H., Leyendecker, B., Ott, N., Brand, A., & Busch, J. (2018). Psychische Diagnostik bei Kindern und Jugendlichen mit Fluchthintergrund im kommunalen Vorsorgesetting – Potenziale der Schuleingangsuntersuchung [Diagnosing refugee children’ and adolescents’ psychological problems in communal prevention settings – Potentials of medical examinations at school enrollment]. Zeitschrift für Flüchtlingsforschung, 2(2), 231–261. https://doi.org/10.5771/2509-9485-2018-2-231
  64. Ellinghaus, R., Miller, J. (2018). Delta plots with negative-going slopes as a potential marker of decreasing response activation in masked semantic priming. Psychological Research, 82(3), 590-599.
  65. Hoffmann, S., Borges, U., Broeker, L., Laborde, S., Liepelt, R., Lobinger, B. H., Loeffler, J., Musculus, L, & Raab, M. (2018). The Psychophysiology of Action: A Multidisciplinary Endeavor for Integrating Action and Cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 9:1423. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01423
  66. Voegler, R., Peterburs, J., Lemke, H., Ocklenburg, S., Liepelt, R., Straube, T. (2018). Electrophysiological correlates of performance monitoring under social observation in patients with social anxiety disorder and healthy controls. Biological Psychology,132, 71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.11.003
  67. Leyendecker, B., Cabrera, N., Lembcke, H., Willard, J., Kohl, K., & Spiegler, O. (2018). Parenting in a new land: Immigrant parents and the positive development of their children and youth. European Psychologist, 23(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000316
  68. Blech, C., & Gaschler, R. (2018). Assessing students’ knowledge about learning and forgetting curves with a free production technique: Measures and implications for the development of learning aids. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 17(3), 308–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725718779684
  69. Blech, C., & Gaschler, R. (2017). Developing a drawing task to differentiate group average time course vs. dynamics in the individual. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 16(2), 212–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725717700516
  70. Schubert, T., Liepelt, R., Kübler, S., & Strobach, T. (2017). Transferability of Dual-Task Coordination Skills after Practice with Changing Component Tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 8:956. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00956
  71. Raab, M., Hoffmann, S., Laborde, S., Lobinger, B. (2017). Von Vertrauenskrisen und Handlungsnormen zu Selbstreflexion und persönlichem Handeln. Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie. 24. 111-119.
  72. Liepelt, R., Dolk, T., & Hommel, B. (2017). Self-perception beyond the body: The role of past agency. Psychological Research, 81, 549-559. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0766-1
  73. Peterburs, J., Voegler, R., Liepelt, R., Schulze, A., Wilhelm, S., Ocklenburg, S., & Straube, T. (2017). Processing of fair and unfair offers in the ultimatum game under social observation. Nature Scientific Reports, 7, 44062. doi: 10.1038/srep44062
  74. Ettinger, U., Faiola, E., Kasparbauer, A. M., Petrovsky, N., Chan, R. C. K., Liepelt R., Kumari, V. (2017). Effects of Nicotine on Response Inhibition and Interference Control. Psychopharmacology, 234, 1093-1111. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4542-8
  75. Stock, A.-K., Hoffmann, S., & Beste, C. (2016). Effects of binge drinking and hangover on response selection subprocesses — a study using EEG and drift diffusion modeling. Addiction Biology, n/a-n/a.
  76. Porcu, E., Bölling, L., Lappe, M., & Liepelt, R. (2016). Pointing out mechanisms underlying Joint Action. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78, 972-977. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1093-8
  77. Liepelt, R., Klempova, B., Dolk, T., Colzato, L. S., Ragert, P., Nitsche, M., & Hommel, B. (2016). The medial frontal cortex mediates self-other discrimination in the Joint Simon task: a tDCS study. Journal of Psychophysiology, 30, 87-101. doi: 10.1027/0269-8803/a000158
  78. Stenzel, A., & Liepelt, R. (2016). Joint action changes valence-based action coding in an implicit attitude task. Psychological Research, 80, 889-903. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0684-7
  79. Stenzel, A., & Liepelt, R. (2016). Joint Simon effects for non-human co-actors. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78, 143-158. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0994-2
  80. Klempova, B., & Liepelt, R. (2016). Do you really represent my task? Sequential adaptation effects to unexpected events support referential coding for the Joint Simon effect. Psychological Research, 80, 449-463. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0664-y
  81. Lembcke, H., Ask Larsen, F., & Janssen, M. (2016). The Influence of Attributions on Emotional and Behavioral Reactions of Care Workers towards Challenging Behavior Among Persons with Deafblindness. Journal of Deafblind Studies on Communication, 1(2), 22-44.
  82. Liepelt, R., & Fischer, R. (2016). Task demands determine hand posture bias on conflict processing in a Simon task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 579-586. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0901-9
  83. Cross, E. S., Ramsey, R., Liepelt, R., Prinz, W., & Hamilton A. F. de C. (2016). The Shaping of Social Perception by Stimulus and Knowledge Cues to Human Animacy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 371 (1686). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0075
  84. Plewan, T., Wascher, E., Falkenstein, M., & Hoffmann, S. (2016). Classifying Response Correctness across Different Task Sets: A Machine Learning Approach. PLOS ONE, 11(3), e0152864. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152864
  85. Raab, M., Lobinger, B., Hoffmann, S., Pizzera, A., & Laborde, S. (2015). Performance Psychology. Elsevier Academic Press.
  86. Hoffmann, S. (2015). Bridging the Gap between Perception and Cognition: An Overview. In Performance Psychology (pp. 136–151). Elsevier Academic Press.
  87. Hoffmann, S. (2015). Performance Monitoring: Causes and Consequences. In Performance Psychology (pp. 152–168). Elsevier Academic Press.
  88. Hoffmann, S., & Beste, C. (2015). A perspective on neural and cognitive mechanisms of error commission. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00050
  89. Wascher, E., Schneider, D., & Hoffmann, S. (2015). Does response selection contribute to inhibition of return? Psychophysiology, 52(7), 942–950.
  90. Job, V., Bernecker, K., Miketta, S., & Friese, M. (2015). Implicit theories about willpower predict the activation of a rest goal following self-control exertion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(4), 694-706. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000042
  91. Sellaro, R., Dolk, T., Colzato, L., Liepelt, R., & Hommel, B. (2015). Referential coding does not rely on location features: Evidence for a non-spatial joint Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, 186-195. doi: 10.1037/a0038548
  92. Schneider, J. & Nett, T. (2015). Safety Issues of Integrating IVI and ADAS functionality via running Linux and AUTOSAR in parallel on a Dual-Core-System. In H. Klenk, H. Keller, E. Plödereder & P. Dencker (Hrsg.), Automotive – Safety & Security 2015.
  93. Schneider, D., Hoffmann, S., & Wascher, E. (2014). Sustained posterior contralateral acti- vity indicates re-entrant target processing in visual change detection: an EEG study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8.
  94. Wascher, E., Rasch, B., Sänger, J., Hoffmann, S., Schneider, D., Rinkenauer, G., Gutberlet, I. (2014). Frontal theta activity reflects distinct aspects of mental fatigue. Biological Psychology, 96, 57–65.
  95. Hoffmann, S. (2014). Brief Report: Some Remarks About the Response Relatedness of the Error Negativity. Journal of Psychophysiology, 28(1), 22–31.
  96. Liepelt, R. (2014). Interacting hands: The role of attention for the joint Simon effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 5:1462. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01462
  97. Hoffmann, S. ,Labrenz, F., Themann, M., Wascher, E., & Beste, C. (2014). Crosslinking EEG time–frequency decomposition and fMRI in error monitoring. Brain Structure and Function, 219(2), 595–605.
  98. Dolk, T., Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., Schütz-Bosbach, S., Prinz, W., & Liepelt, R. (2014). The joint Simon effect: A review and theoretical integration. Frontiers in Psychology, 5:974. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00974
  99. Dolk, T., Hommel, B., Prinz, W., & Liepelt, R. (2014). The joint Flanker effect: less social than previously thought. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1224-1230. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0583-8
  100. Stenzel, A., Dolk, T., Colzato, L. S., Sellaro, R., Hommel, B., & Liepelt, R. (2014). The joint Simon effect depends on perceived agency, but not intentionality, of the alternative action. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8:595. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00595
  101. Schneider, J., Nett, T. (2014). Safety Issues of Integrating IVI and ADAS functionality via running Linux and AUTOSAR in parallel on a Dual-Core-System. In Automotive-Safety & Security (pp. 55-68)
  102. Wascher, E., Heppner, H., & Hoffmann, S. (2014). Towards the measurement of eventrelated EEG activity in real-life working environments. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 91(1), 3–9.
  103. Plewan, T., Wascher, E., Hoffmann, S.: Elektroenzephalografie und Mustererkennung als benutzerunabhängiges Werkzeug für die Marktforschung. In: Gestaltung der Arbeitswelt der Zukunft: 60. Kongress der Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft, TU und Hochschule München, 12.-14.03.2014 (S. 381-383) / GfA, Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft e.V. [Schriftltg.: Matthias Jäger]. Dortmund: GfA-Press, 2014.
  104. Nett, T., Schneider, J. (2014). Automated planning of charge processes for privately owned electric vehicles. In Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE), 2014 International Conference on (pp. 402-407).
  105. Nett, T., Schneider, J. (2013, October). Running Linux and AUTOSAR side by side. In 7th Junior Researcher Workshop on Real-Time Computing (pp. 29-32).
  106. Colzato, L.S., Steenbergen, L., de Kwaadsteniet, E.W., Sellaro, R., Liepelt, R., & Hommel, B. (2013). Tryptophan promotes interpersonal trust. Psychological Science, 24, 2575-2577. doi: 10.1177/0956797613500795
  107. Liepelt, R., Wenke, D., & Fischer, R. (2013). Effects of Feature Integration in a Hands-Crossed Version of the Social Simon Paradigm. Psychological Research, 77, 240-248. doi: 10.1007/s00426-012-0425-0
  108. Dolk, T., Hommel, B., Prinz, W., & Liepelt, R. (2013). The (not so) Social Simon effect: A referential coding account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1248-1260. doi: 10.1037/a0031031
  109. Stenzel, A., Chinellato, E., del Pobil, Á. P., Lappe, M., & Liepelt, R. (2013). How deeply do we include robotic agents in the self? International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 10, 1-13. doi: 10.1142/S0219843613500151
  110. Dolk, T., Liepelt, R., Prinz, W., & Fiehler, K. (2013). Visual experience determines the use of external reference frames in joint action control. PLoS ONE 8(3): e59008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059008
  111. Strobach, T., Liepelt, R., Frensch, P. A., Pashler, H., & Schubert, T. (2013). Effects of Extensive Dual-Task Practice on Processing Stages in Simultaneous Choice Tasks. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 900-920. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0451-z
  112. Hoffmann, S. & Falkenstein, M. (2012). Predictive information processing in the brain: Errors and response monitoring. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83 (2), 208–212.
  113. Hoffmann, S. & Falkenstein, M. (2012). Personality and error monitoring:an update. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/ fnhum.2012.00171
  114. Liepelt, R., Schneider, J. C., Aichert, D., Wöstmann, N., Dehning, S., Möller, H. J., Riedel, M., Dolk, D., & Ettinger, U. (2012). Action Blind: Disturbed Self-other Integration in Schizophrenia. Neuropsychologia, 50, 3775-3780. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.10.027
  115. Wascher, E., Schneider, D., Hoffmann, S., Beste, C. & Sänger, J. (2012). When compensation fails: Perceptual deficits in healthy ageing caused by visual distraction. Neuropsychologia, 50, 3185-3192.
  116. Stenzel, A., Chinellato, E., Tirado Bou, M. A., del Pobil, Á. P., Lappe, M., & Liepelt, R. (2012). When humanoid robots become human-like interaction partners: co-representation of robotic actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1073-1077. doi: 10.1037/a0029493
  117. Liepelt, R., Stenzel, A., & Lappe, M. (2012). Specifying social cognitive processes with a social dual-task paradigm. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6:86. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00086
  118. Hoffmann, S. & Wascher, E. (2012). Spatial cueing modulates the monitoring of correct responses. Neuroscience Letters, 506 (2), 225–228.
  119. Dolk, T., Liepelt, R., Villringer, A., Prinz, W., & Ragert, P. (2012). Morphometric gray matter differences of the medial frontal cortex influence the social Simon effect. NeuroImage, 61, 1249–1254. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.061
  120. Cross, E. S., Liepelt, R., Hamilton, A. F., Parkinson, J., Ramsey, R., Stadler, W., & Prinz, W. (2012). Robotic movement preferentially engages the action observation network. Human Brain Mapping, 33, 2238–2254. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21361
  121. Beisert, M., Zmyj, N., Liepelt, R., Jung, F., Prinz, W., & Daum, M. (2012). Rethinking ‘Rational Imitation’ in 14-Month-Old Infants: A Perceptual Distraction Approach. PLoS One, 7(3): e32563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032563
  122. Liepelt, R., Dolk, T., & Prinz, W. (2012). Bidirectional semantic interference between action and speech. Psychological Research, 76, 446-455. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0390-z
  123. Strobach, T., Liepelt, R., Schubert, T., Kiesel A. (2012). Task Switching: Effects of Practice on Switch and Mixing Costs. Psychological Research, 76, 74-83. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0323-x
  124. Liepelt, R., & Prinz, W. (2011). How two share two tasks: evidence of a Social Psychological Refractory Period effect. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 387-396. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2703-2
  125. Hoffmann, S. & Falkenstein, M. (2011). Aging and error processing: age related increase in the variability of the error-negativity is not accompanied by increase in response variability. PLoS One, 6 (2), e17482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0017482
  126. Dolk, T., Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., Schütz-Bosbach, S., Prinz, W., & Liepelt, R. (2011). How ‘social’ is the social Simon effect? Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1-9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00084
  127. Wenke, D., Atmaca, S., Holländer, A., Liepelt, R., Baess, P., & Prinz, W. (2011). What is shared in joint action? Issues of Co-representation, Response Conflict, and Agent Identification. The Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2, 147-172. doi: 10.1007/s13164-011-0057-0
  128. Falkenstein, M., Wild-Wall, N. & Hoffmann, S. (2011). Lehr-Lernforschung unter neurowissenschaftlicher Perspektive. In A. Heine & A. Jacobs (Hrsg.), (Kap. Neurophysiologische Aspekte des Zweitspracherwerbs: Der Effekt von korrektivem Feedback auf die Fehlerverarbeitung und das Lernen). Münster: Waxmann-Verlag.
  129. Liepelt, R., Wenke, D., Fischer, R., & Prinz, W. (2011). Trial-to-trial sequential dependencies in a social and non-social Simon task. Psychological Research, 75, 366-­375. doi: 10.1007/s00426-010-0314-3
  130. Springer, A., Brandstädter, S., Liepelt, R., Birngruber, T., Giese M., Mechsner, F., & Prinz, W. (2011). Motor execution affects action prediction. Brain and Cognition, 76, 26-­36. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.03.007
  131. Liepelt, R., Fischer, R., Frensch, P. A., & Schubert, T. (2011). Practice-related reduction of dual-task costs under conditions of a manual-pedal response combination. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 29-44. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2011.448025
  132. Liepelt, R., Strobach, T., Frensch, P., & Schubert, T. (2011). Improved Inter-task Coordination Skills after extensive Dual-task Practice. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1251.1272. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.543284
  133. Hoffmann, S. & Falkenstein, M. (2010). Independent component analysis of erroneous and correct responses suggests online response control. Human Brain Mapping, 31 (9), 1305–1315.
  134. Beste, C., Otto, T. & Hoffmann, S. (2010). The biopsychology-nonlinear analysis toolbox: a free, open-source Matlabtoolbox for the non-linear analysis of time series data. Neuroinformatics, 8, 197-200.
  135. Blech, C. & Funke, J. (2010). You cannot have your cake and eat it, too: How induced goal conflicts affect complex problem solving. Open Psychology Journal, 3, 42-53. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874350101003010042
  136. Vlainic, E., Liepelt, R., Colzato, L. S., Prinz, W., & Hommel, B. (2010). The virtual co-actor: the Social Simon effect does not rely on online feedback from the other. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 208. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00208
  137. Wascher, E. & Hoffmann, S. (2010). Okonomie experimentalpsychologischer Messung im Anwendungskontext. In M. Schütte (Hrsg.), Neue Arbeits- und Lebenswelten gestalten: 56. Kongress der Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft (S. 579–582). Institut für Arbeitswissenschaft der Techn. Univ. Darmstadt: GfA-Press.
  138. Liepelt, R., Prinz, W., Brass, M. (2010). When do we simulate non-human agents? Dissociating communicative and non-communicative actions. Cognition, 115, 426-434. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.003
  139. Liepelt, R., & Brass, M. (2010). Automatic imitation of physically impossible movements. Social Cognition, 28, 59-74. doi: 10.1521/soco.2010.28.1.59
  140. Liepelt, R., & Brass, M. (2010). Top-down modulation of motor priming by belief about animacy. Experimental Psychology, 57, 221-227. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000028
  141. Wascher, E., Hoffmann, S., Sänger, J. & Grosjean, M. (2009). Visuo-spatial processing and the N1 component of the ERP. Psychophysiology, 46 (6), 1270–1277.
  142. Liepelt, R., Ullsperger, M., Obst, K., Spengler, S., von Cramon, D. Y., Brass, M. (2009). Contextual movement constraints of others modulate motor preparation in the observer. Neuropsychologia, 47, 268-275. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.008
  143. Gajewski, P. D., Wild-Wall, N., Hoffmann, S. & Falkenstein, M. (2009). Ereigniskorrelierte Potenziale: Ansatz, Parametrisierung und Analyseverfahren. Neuroforum, 15, 124–129..
  144. Hoffmann, S. (2009). Independent component analysis of ocular artifacts. Bochum University. Dissertation.
  145. Liepelt, R., von Cramon, D. Y., Brass, M. (2008). How do we infer Others’ Goals from Non-stereotypic Actions? The Outcome of Context-Sensitive Inferential Processing in Right Inferior Parietal and Posterior Temporal Cortex. Neuroimage, 43, 784-792. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.007
  146. Catmur, C., Gillmeister, H., Bird, G., Liepelt, R., Brass, M., & Heyes, C. M. (2008). Through the looking glass: counter‐mirror activation following incompatible sensorimotor learning. European Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 1208–1215. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06419.x
  147. Hoffmann, S. & Falkenstein, M. (2008). The correction of eye blink artefacts in the EEG: a comparison of two prominent methods. PLoS One, 3 (8), e3004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003004
  148. Gillmeister, H., Catmur, C., Liepelt, R., Brass, M., & Heyes, C. M. (2008). Experience-based priming of body parts: A study of action imitation. Brain Research, 1217, 157-170. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.12.076
  149. Liepelt, R., von Cramon, D. Y., Brass, M. (2008). What is matched in direct matching? Intention attribution modulates motor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 578-591. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.578
  150. Fischer, R., Schubert, T., & Liepelt, R. (2007). Accessory stimuli modulate effects of nonconscious priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 9-22. doi: 10.3758/BF03194449
  151. Blech, C. & Funke, J. (2006). Zur Reaktivität von Kausaldiagramm-Analysen beim komplexen Problemlösen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 214(4), 185-195.https://doi.org/10.1026/0044-3409.214.4.185
Allgemeine Psychologie: UEH | 16.04.2024